11.6 Results & Analysis
Reproducing the evaluation metrics from the Cricket AI paper (3,627 claims, 97.71% auto-verification).
Reproducing the evaluation metrics from the Cricket AI paper (3,627 claims, 97.71% auto-verification).
Non-determinism, subjective quality, and benchmark gaming in LLM evaluation.
BLEU, ROUGE, BERTScore, and RAGAS (faithfulness, relevance) for LLM evaluation.
Rubric design, pairwise comparison, and calibration for LLM-as-judge evaluation.
Annotation guidelines, inter-rater reliability, and stratified sampling for LLM eval.
Dataset creation, test harness, and CI/CD for LLM output quality assurance.
Before/after comparison, catastrophic forgetting detection, and overfitting signals.